点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
欢乐春节回家过年，“我的年夜饭”你期待吗？******
中新网北京1月14日电(刘越)大年三十“吃”一宿，大年初一扭一扭。这个兔年春节，你的年夜饭准备整点啥菜色？
饺子馒头年年有“鱼”，大虾猪蹄排骨烧鸡。北京的炸丸子，上海的八宝饭，两广一家老小围坐“打边炉”，东北挨家挨户狂炫“铁锅炖”，川渝的麻辣香肠油汪汪，山东的糖醋鲤鱼甜带酸……嘿，琳琅满目的全是硬菜！也是，大过年的，谁和你保温杯里泡枸杞，燃烧我的卡路里？
不过有一说一，我泱泱中华地大物博，年夜饭一户一味，完全不重样好伐？说到这里，可能许多网友已经按捺不住了，武汉伢子端着肉糕鱼糕上场，河南妮儿展示“八大碗”，湖南、江西、贵州、新疆的朋友们也纷纷踊跃发言。此时一位广东的靓仔路过，“打什么边炉，我们吃白切鸡的喔！”
既然大家的分享欲这么强烈，那么，欢乐春节“我的年夜饭”活动，了解一下？
号外号外！由文化和旅游部指导，中国对外文化交流协会主办的2023年“欢乐春节”来啦！欢乐春节“我的年夜饭”征集活动也已正式启动！该活动由中国对外文化交流协会、中国新闻网主办，腾讯微信视频号承办，中国旅游饭店业协会协办，新浪微博提供平台支持。在1月14日—23日期间，境内外网友、海外华侨华人、留学生等均可通过腾讯微信视频号、新浪微博发布#我的年夜饭#话题、故事、图像、视频等系列产品！
你可以分享年夜饭中的中国美食制作过程及工艺——
“爸妈，让我来给你们露一手！”
“好咧儿子，你做个松鼠鳜鱼吧！”
“松鼠？什么松鼠……”
“……我看你像松鼠。”
资料图。中新社记者 杨华峰 摄你可以介绍、展示传统春节习俗及海外过春节的场景——
“女儿，新年快乐！你一个人在国外也要好好吃年夜饭哦！”
“知道了妈，我正和外国室友一起包饺子呢，猪肉大葱馅的，可香啦！”
“那老外吃得惯咱们的饺子吗？”
“妈，那你可太不了解外国人有多爱吃饺子了，你女儿能虎口夺食全靠当年高中冲食堂的经验……”
你还可以回忆与众不同的春节年夜饭经历，讲述年夜饭中的中外文化交流故事等——
“交警叔叔，新年快乐！你们辛苦了，这是我们家蒸的年糕，可好吃了！”
“谢谢宝贝儿，叔叔有阿姨送过来的年糕，你回家的时候要走斑马线，注意安全哦！”
资料图。蒋云庆 供图是不是觉得脑海中的各种创意、回忆、吐槽欲都已经喷涌而出？那就快来参与吧！方式非常简单，在使用微信视频号发表相关视频时，于“活动”一栏输入“我的年夜饭”并选择即可参与，也欢迎大家带#我的年夜饭 话题发布短视频，或带#我的年夜饭#话题发布微博，我们一起记录你的春节味道！
此外，该活动从1月14日开始陆续发布各领域名人明星录制的#我的年夜饭#相关主题短视频。你可以和多位重磅神秘嘉宾一起分享年夜饭，惊不惊喜，意不意外？
最最最重要的是，评选出来的优秀作品将在中国新闻网官方视频号进行展播，还有机会出现在中国新闻网微信公众号上！朋友，你的爸妈能不能在这个春节成为“别人家的爸妈”，红遍亲戚朋友圈，就靠你了！
让我们红尘作伴，吃得白白胖胖。观众朋友准备好了吗？来晒出你的年夜饭吧！(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)